PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Journal of Mid-life Health0 citationsOpen Access

Reimagining Aging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality on Cognitive, Physical, and Functional Outcomes in Older Adults

View Full Paper
CCCharu ChhabraSKSohrab Ahmad KhanVCVarsha Chorsiya

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality training on cognitive, physical, and functional performance in older adults.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • Searched online databases for relevant research studies
  • Assessed bias risk and extracted data from included studies
  • Calculated standardized mean differences for functional outcomes
  • Total of 16 randomized controlled trials included in the review
  • No statistically significant overall differences in functional fitness (SMD = –0.175)
  • High heterogeneity observed in study outcomes (I² = 85.96%)
  • Two studies reported significant positive effects on outcomes

Abstract

A BSTRACT The diverse applications of virtual reality (VR) for older adults require a need for comprehensive, updated syntheses, and research to understand VR’s effectiveness across cognitive, physical, and functional domains. This study aimed to assess the effects of VR training on cognition, physical, and functional parameters in older adults through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Online databases were searched for relevant articles, which were screened for eligibility and data extraction following bias risk assessment. A total of sixteen RCTs were included in this systematic literature review. A meta-analysis was conducted using data extracted from the included studies. Standardized mean differences were calculated for Time Up and Go test, which is a measure of functional fitness. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) using a random effects model was – 0.175 (95% confidence interval CI; −0.834–0.483; P = 0.600), indicating no statistically significant difference between intervention and control groups. There was substantial heterogeneity among the included studies (Q = 42.74, df = 6, P < 0.0001), with an I value of 85.96%, suggesting considerable inconsistency in effect sizes. Among included studies, two reported statistically significant effects: Zak et al . (2022), SMD = 0.812 (95% CI: 0.053–1.570), and Htut et al . (2018), SMD = −1.996 (95% Cl: −2.750 to − 1.242). Remaining studies showed non-significant SMDs. The current review concludes that VR-based interventions are helpful for geriatric rehabilitation, especially when it comes to improving older adults’ functional, cognitive, and physical outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chhabra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fca7a79560c99a0a2528https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_223_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of virtual reality intervention on motor function in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis2025
  2. 2Effects of Cognitive Training with Virtual Reality in Older Adults: A Systematic Review2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Virtual Reality on Cognitive Function and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment.2025
  4. 4Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Training Versus Conventional Exercise Programs on Fall-Related Functional Outcomes in Older Adults with Various Health Conditions: A Systematic Review2025 · 4 citations
  5. 5The application potential of virtual reality technology in managing elderly frailty: a meta-analysis2026