PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 237: Selective Cytotoxicity of Base Excision Repair Inhibitor, TRC102, in DNA Damage Response Hyperactivated Glioblastoma.

View Full Paper
SSShaunak SatheQLQi LiJJJinkyu Jung

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess TRC102's selective cytotoxic effects on glioblastoma cells with hyperactivated DNA damage response signaling.
  • Performed gene set enrichment analysis using RNA-seq on 24 glioblastoma cell lines.
  • Identified three patient-derived cell lines with hyperactivated DNA damage response.
  • Evaluated treatment efficacy utilizing cell viability, colony formation, and immunofluorescence assays.
  • TRC102 induced significant DNA damage and cell death in DDR-hyperactivated glioblastoma cell lines.
  • In L0 and L1 cell lines, TRC102 significantly inhibited colony formation and cell proliferation over 72 hours.
  • TRC102 suppressed CHK2 activity and HIF protein expression, contributing to enhanced cytotoxic effects.

Abstract

Abstract Background Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and lethal type of brain tumor. Tumor heterogeneity and DNA repair pathways contribute strongly to poor outcomes, highlighting the need for more personalized approaches. TRC102 (methoxyamine hydrochloride) is a small-molecule inhibitor of base excision repair that acts by covalently binding to abasic sites and preventing downstream repair enzymes from repairing the lesion. Clinical studies utilizing TRC102 in glioblastoma have identified hyperactivated DNA damage response (DDR) gene signature among exceptional responders, suggesting DDR-hyperactivity as a potential clinical biomarker. Here, we evaluated whether glioblastoma cells reliant on DDR signaling are particularly vulnerable to TRC102 treatment. Methods We performed gene set enrichment analysis using RNA-seq data across 24 glioblastoma cell lines within the NCI, Neuro Oncology Branch database and identified three patient-derived cell lines (L0, L1, GSC627) with hyperactivated DDR signature. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using cell viability, colony formation, DNA damage, repair and immunofluorescence assays. Results TRC102 treatment alone induced significant DNA damage and cell death in DDR-hyperactivated glioblastoma cell lines, whereas DDR-hypoactivated cells showed minimal sensitivity. In L0 and L1 cell lines, TRC102 treatment significantly inhibited colony formation and cell proliferation over 72-hour treatment. Mechanistic studies through western blotting revealed that TRC102 led to significant suppression of CHK2 activity, a key kinase involved in the DDR that controls cell cycle progression. Abrogation of cell cycle checkpoint blockades through CHK2 depletion may allow glioblastoma cells to initiate mitosis without fully resolving DNA damage, leading to mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Interestingly, TRC102 also suppressed HIF protein expression in hypoxic conditions, leading to eventual cell death. Conclusions The antitumor effect of TRC102 appears to be mediated through targeting of the newly identified ATM-CHK2-HIF axis, allowing for selective cytotoxicity in DDR-hyperactivated glioblastoma. These results suggest a specific vulnerability to TRC102 in DDR-hyperactivated glioblastoma that are typically resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiation therapy, supporting biomarker-driven patient selection in future clinical studies. Citation Format: Shaunak Sathe, Qi Li, Jinkyu Jung, Peng Lu, Zach Sergi, Herui Wang, Jing Wu. Selective Cytotoxicity of Base Excision Repair Inhibitor, TRC102, in DNA Damage Response Hyperactivated Glioblastoma abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 237.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sathe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd13a79560c99a0a2ec1https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-237
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1151 Exceptional Responders to Base Excision Repair (BER) Inhibition for Recurrent Glioblastoma Display Enrichment for DNA Damage Response Pathways: RNA Sequencing Analysis From a Multicenter Trial2024
  2. 2Data from Evaluating the Base Excision Repair Inhibitor TRC102 and Temozolomide for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma in the Phase 2 Adult Brain Tumor Consortium Trial BERT2024
  3. 3Abstract 993: From phenotypic screening to mechanistic insight: Rational discovery of chemosensitizers for glioblastoma2026
  4. 4Abstract B051: DNA damage signaling activates GTP synthesis to promote glioblastoma treatment resistance2024
  5. 5Abstract B022: Interplay between the cellular dntp pool and dna double-strand break repair: a potential therapeutic target for refractory glioblastoma2024