PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 1378: Development and validation of a parsimonious electronic health record model for pancreatic cancer risk stratification.

View Full Paper
LMLucas A. MavromatisVZViktor ZlatanicEAEmil Agarunov

Key Result

A parsimonious 19-predictor electronic health record model predicted 3-year incident pancreatic cancer with an AUC of 0.75 and a hazard ratio of 7.63 for the highest risk percentile.

Key Points

  • To develop and validate a parsimonious risk stratification model for pancreatic cancer using electronic health records.
  • Utilized Optum Labs DataWarehouse for national EHR data.
  • Developed a Cox model predicting incident pancreatic cancer in adults ≥40 years.
  • Employed elastic net with 10-fold cross-validation to select risk predictors from EHR data.
  • Assessed model performance with a 3-year AUC and calibration metrics across diverse health systems.
  • 14,405 patients developed pancreatic cancer in the training cohort (mean age 60.4), with an incidence rate of 56 per 100,000 person-years.
  • The model included 19 key predictors, such as chronic pancreatitis and type 2 diabetes.
  • 3-year AUC was 0.75, demonstrating strong discrimination in both training and validation cohorts.
  • In the UK Biobank, the model maintained a decent AUC of 0.71, indicating good generalizability.

Structured PICO

Can a parsimonious EHR-based Cox model accurately predict incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in adults?

P
Population
Adults ages ≥40 years from U.S. EHR and claims database (Optum Labs DataWarehouse) and UK Biobank. Training cohort N=4,836,428 (mean age 60.4); validation cohort N=5,607,398 (mean age 60.2); UK Biobank validation N=498,754.
I
Intervention
Parsimonious EHR-based Cox prediction model using 19 predictors (including chronic pancreatitis, prior cancers, type 2 diabetes, elevated AST, current smoking, male sex) for pancreatic cancer risk stratification.
O
Outcome
Incident pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prediction performance (assessed by 3-year AUC and calibration).

A parsimonious EHR-based risk model demonstrates strong discrimination and generalizability for predicting 3-year incident pancreatic cancer risk across U.S. and UK cohorts.

Abstract

Abstract Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States by 2030. Early detection of PDAC improves outcomes. However, screening is impractical in the general population due to low disease incidence. We previously developed a PDAC prediction model using machine learning in an institutional electronic health record (EHR) database. Here, we aimed to improve generalizability, interpretability, and parsimony by developing and validating a Cox model in a national EHR database. Methods We used Optum Labs DataWarehouse (OLDW), a U.S. EHR and claims database, to develop a Cox model predicting incident PDAC in adults ages ≥40 years in 23 health systems (training cohort; N = 4,836,428). Elastic net with 10-fold cross-validation selected from candidate risk predictors, which included demographics, diagnoses/symptoms measured by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, and routine laboratory values. Performance was assessed by 3-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration slope and intercept in 31 distinct health systems (validation cohort; N = 5,607,398). Sensitivity analyses excluded adults 50 years, those with abdominal imaging in the prior year, and PDAC diagnosed in the first 6 months, and stratified participants by sex. International validation was performed in the UK Biobank (UKB) (N = 498,754). Results In the training cohort (mean age 60.4 years), 14,405 patients developed PDAC, with a crude incidence rate (IR) of 56 per 100,000 person-years (PY); in the validation cohort (mean age 60.2 years), 11,693 patients developed PDAC (IR, 55/100,000 PY). The final elastic net model included 19 predictors. Top predictors included chronic pancreatitis and other gastrointestinal conditions, prior cancers, type 2 diabetes, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, current smoking, and male sex. 3-year AUC was 0.75 in both the training and validation cohorts; discrimination was equivalent in males and females. 3-year calibration in the validation cohort was excellent. The hazard ratio of PDAC in the top percentile of predicted risk compared to the 45th-55th percentile was 7.63 (95% CI, 6.85-8.49) and NNS in the top percentile was 128 (95% CI, 117-141). Performance was similar after excluding patients with recent abdominal imaging, PDAC diagnosed in the 6 months following index, and patients under 50. In UKB (IR, 44/100,000 PY), AUC was 0.71 with acceptable calibration. Conclusions A parsimonious EHR-based PDAC risk model developed in diverse U.S. health systems demonstrated strong 3-year discrimination and good generalizability to cohorts in the United States and United Kingdom. A subsequent prospective validation study will assess the feasibility of EHR-driven PDAC case-finding. Citation Format: Lucas A. Mavromatis, Viktor Zlatanic, Emil Agarunov, Long Chen, Shenin A. Sanoba, Leora I. Horwitz, Narges Razavian, Anirban Maitra, Tamas A. Gonda, Morgan E. Grams. Development and validation of a parsimonious electronic health record model for pancreatic cancer risk stratification abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1378.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mavromatis et al. (2026) studied this question. A parsimonious 19-predictor electronic health record model predicted 3-year incident pancreatic cancer with an AUC of 0.75 and a hazard ratio of 7.63 for the highest risk percentile.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fd9ca79560c99a0a3c64https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1378
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper