PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026CLEAN - Soil Air Water0 citationsOpen Access

Commuting Challenges for Big Cities: How to Tackle Particulate Matter Human Exposure?

MCMarianna Gonçalves Dias ChavesCSCamila Ribeiro SchneiderEMEmílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how different transport modes affect human exposure to particulate matter in urban settings.
  • Monitored particulate matter in walking and bus commuting in Curitiba, Brazil.
  • Collected real-time data using low-cost sensors and microcontrollers.
  • Applied machine learning models to identify pollution drivers.
  • Measured exposure levels and inhaled doses for both transport methods.
  • Mean particulate matter concentrations were higher in buses than when walking.
  • Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded WHO daily limits for particulate matter.
  • Cumulative exposure while walking (0.18) was greater than on buses (0.11).
  • Highest exposure levels occurred near major highways, with strong correlations in walking exposure (R = 0.91).
  • Boundary layer height was the strongest predictor of particulate matter exposure.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Air quality in large cities is a global public health issue that has received increasing attention in recent decades. The dynamics of atmospheric pollutant concentrations form a complex system influenced by meteorology, topography, emission sources, and fleet composition, interacting in a nonlinear pattern. We monitored particulate matter (PM) in two transport modes (walking and bus) and a fixed point in Curitiba, Brazil, to understand human exposure. Real‐time and concentrations, with GPS data, were collected using low‐cost sensors and microcontrollers. Machine learning models identified key pollution drivers. Results showed that mean PM concentrations were higher inside buses. Afternoon bus samples frequently exceeded 45 / for , surpassing WHO daily limits, while the highest walking peak (approximately 34–35 /) occurred near a major highway. and were strongly correlated, especially for walking ( R = 0.91). Despite higher concentrations inside buses, cumulative exposure and inhaled dose were greater while walking, with average exposure of 0.18 (vs. 0.11 on buses) and average inhaled doses of 5.74 (walking) versus 3.05 (bus). Longer commute duration and increased inhalation rates explain this difference. Random Forest (RF) analysis identified boundary layer height as the most important predictor of , followed by relative humidity and the number of SUVs. These findings highlight how meteorology, fleet composition, and travel mode shape exposure and support strategies for healthier and sustainable urban mobility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaves et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fde4a79560c99a0a431fhttps://doi.org/10.1002/clen.70162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper