PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Journal of Craniofacial Surgery0 citations

An Interpretable Fuzzy-AI Clinical Decision Support System for Selecting Orthognathic Surgery in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

View Full Paper
CTChihiro TanikawaKOKeiko OkamotoKTKenji Takada

Key Points

  • The aim is to create an AI framework that aids clinicians in deciding between orthognathic surgery and orthodontic camouflage for class III malocclusion.
  • Developed a fuzzy inference model to analyze cephalometric data
  • Classified 86 patients into Surgery or Camouflage groups based on expert evaluations
  • Constructed a decision-tree model using cephalometric variables and membership grades
  • Assessed model performance using area under the curve (AUC) analysis
  • Integrated a large language model for interpretability of diagnostic outputs
  • Identified key predictors including overjet and MG with decision-tree analysis
  • Achieved an excellent AUC of 0.97 for the final model
  • Successfully provided concise, clinician-oriented explanations using the LLM
  • The framework emphasizes expert reasoning and enhances treatment planning reproducibility

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an interpretable fuzzy-artificial intelligence (AI) framework to support treatment decision-making between orthognathic surgery and orthodontic camouflage in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion, while providing clinician-oriented explanations using a large language model (LLM). Eighty-six patients with skeletal class III malocclusion were classified into Surgery or Camouflage groups based on treatment plans determined by multiple experienced orthodontists. Pretreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed, and 22 cephalometric variables were measured. A fuzzy inference model was used to calculate a membership grade (MG) representing the severity of skeletal class III sagittal discrepancy, based on visual evaluation of the facial profile. The MG was derived from a composite index incorporating 4 sagittal skeletal parameters: the ANB angle, chin-to-Nasion perpendicular distance, cranial base length, and mandibular body length. A decision-tree model was subsequently constructed using MG and selected cephalometric variables, and its discriminative performance was assessed using cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) analysis. To enhance interpretability, the mathematical decision framework was integrated with an LLM that generated concise, clinician-friendly diagnostic explanations without altering the underlying decision logic. Decision-tree analysis identified overjet, MG, lower facial height, and the H angle, an indicator of lip prominence, as the most influential predictors of treatment selection. The final model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance, with an AUC of 0.97. The LLM successfully translated the rule-based diagnostic output into brief explanatory summaries, and the complete system was implemented as open-source software. This LLM-integrated fuzzy-AI framework formalizes key elements of expert clinical reasoning and may improve the transparency, standardization, and reproducibility of treatment planning for skeletal class III malocclusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tanikawa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdf7a79560c99a0a4554https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012683
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper