PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Industrial Construction0 citations

Research on Welding Residual Stress Distribution in Double-Sided Welded U-Rib Steel Bridge Decks Based on Fatigue Cracking Mode

View Full Paper
QZQiu ZhaoZLZhengzhe LinJDJin Gan Dai

Key Points

  • The research aims to investigate how residual stress affects the fatigue performance of double-sided welded U-rib steel bridge decks.
  • Conducted numerical simulations to study welding process and residual stress distribution.
  • Examined parameters influencing residual stress across four cracking modes in roof-to-U-rib connections.
  • Derived empirical formulas to predict residual stress for different cracking conditions.
  • Transverse residual tensile stress showed a tension-compression-tension pattern along thickness.
  • Maximum tensile stress reached 241.5 MPa across all modes.
  • Increasing roof thickness from 12 mm to 20 mm raised peak compressive stress by 35.8%.
  • Tensile stress increased from 155.9 MPa to 199.6 MPa (28.0% increase) for T1 cracking mode.
  • For T2 mode, tensile stress jumped from 186.7 MPa to 242.9 MPa (30.1% increase).

Abstract

In order to study the influence of residual stress on the fatigue performance of double-sided welded steel bridge decks, the welding process and residual stress distribution of double-sided welded U-rib steel bridge decks were studied by numerical simulations. It examined the effects of parameters on the residual stress distribution for four cracking modes in the roof-to-U-rib connection of double-sided welded U-rib steel bridge decks. Empirical formulas were derived to predict the residual stress distribution under these different cracking modes. The results showed that the transverse residual tensile stress for all four cracking modes exhibited a tension-compression-tension distribution pattern along the thickness direction. The maximum tensile stress observed was 241.5 MPa. For the T1 cracking mode (characterized by crack propagation at the outer weld toe through the plate thickness), increasing the roof thickness from 12 mm to 20 mm caused the peak compressive stress to rise from 68 MPa to 93 MPa (a 35.8% increase), while the tensile stress increased from 155.9 MPa to 199.6 MPa (a 28.0% increase). The U-rib thickness showed minimal effect, but increasing the groove angle reduced both the transverse tensile stress and compressive stress. For the T2 cracking mode (characterized by crack propagation at the inner weld toe through the plate thickness), the plate thickness had little influence on the peak compressive stress. However, the tensile stress increased from 186.7 MPa to 242.9 MPa, representing an increase of approximately 30.1%. Both the U-rib thickness and groove angle demonstrated negligible effects on the T2 mode.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fdf7a79560c99a0a4560https://doi.org/10.3724/j.gyjzg23050910
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper