PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract 1068: Combining circulating tumor cells and cancer associated macrophage-like cells enhances risk stratification models in pan-cancer metastatic disease

View Full Paper
DADaniel L. AdamsSLSteven H. LinMCMassimo Cristofanilli

Key Points

  • Evaluate the combined prognostic utility of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) in metastatic cancer patients.
  • Conducted a prospective 2-year multi-institutional study with 233 patients across six metastatic cancer types.
  • Filtered blood samples to isolate CTCs and enlarged CAMLs using CellSieve™ filters.
  • Developed predictive models using a machine learning algorithm incorporating clinical variables for outcomes.
  • 80% of patients had no detectable CTCs, which was linked to better progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Enlarged CAMLs were found in 28% of patients without CTCs, correlating with worse PFS and overall survival (OS).
  • Using combined biomarkers, the study identified distinct PFS and OS outcomes based on the presence and size of CTCs and CAMLs.

Abstract

Abstract Background: In metastatic cancer, Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are established prognostic indictors of patients (pts) less likely to respond to new lines of systemic therapy, with poor clinical outcomes, such as shorter progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, CTCs are typically found in specific malignancies (breast, prostate 20% of pts with metastatic disease, and pts without CTCs may also rapidly progress. Recently, an inflammatory pro-tumorigenic macrophage emanating from tumor stroma (i.e. Cancer associated macrophage-like cell CAML) was found in 90% of metastatic cancer pts, and whose phagocytic engorgement appears to correlate with poor outcomes, independent of CTCs. As CTCs and CAMLs are isolated in conjunction from a single blood sample, and both are prognostic for outcomes, we evaluated their utilization prior to induction of new systemic therapy in 6 types of metastatic cancer to model pt risk stratification based on 2 year outcomes. Methods: A prospective 2 year blind multi-institutional study was undertaken to model CTCs and CAMLs in prognosticating outcomes prior to induction of a new line of systemic therapy (n=233) in metastatic: Breast (n=60), Prostate (n=40), Pancreas (n=25), Colon (n=28), Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) (n=39), and Lung (n=40). Blood was filtered by CellSieveTM filters with subtypes of CTCs 100µm CAMLs (n=134) had a mPFS=10.7 24 months. Conclusions: These initial models confirm that both CTCs and enlarged CAMLs are prognostic indicators of worse PFS Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1068.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adams et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d1fe18a79560c99a0a4a3fhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper