PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology2 citations

The dt-Report: A Novel Real-World Data Approach to Understanding the Use and Impact of Diabetes Technology in European Countries

View Full Paper
DBDerek BrandtNHNorbert HermannsDEDominic Ehrmann

Key Points

  • To explore the real-world efficacy of diabetes technology in managing diabetes among users in Europe.
  • Conducted a detailed survey among health care professionals and individuals with diabetes.
  • Evaluated technology use in relation to daily management challenges.
  • Analyzed responses from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
  • Confirmed that diabetes technology reduces daily management burdens for users.
  • Identified barriers to effective use of automated insulin delivery systems.
  • Found varying impacts across demographics, including aging and type 2 diabetes populations.

Abstract

Usage of diabetes technology by people living with diabetes does help them a lot with their daily diabetes management burden. Evidence for the efficacy of using systems for continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery, and so on has largely been derived from randomized controlled trials, which are pivotal for regulatory approvals and reimbursement decisions. However, evidence obtained from real-world usage of technology is crucial as it confirms the benefits also under such conditions. Data obtained from a detailed survey answered by health care professionals and people living with diabetes provides further insights into the reality of usage. They also help to understand the hurdles in daily life and what can be done to overcome these. In this special theme issue, a set of specific topics is addressed that are of academic and clinical importance: dropouts from automated insulin delivery systems, technology use in people living with type 2 diabetes, technology and aging, smart insulin pens, and green diabetes. The data basis for the analysis presented in these manuscripts is from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. In the future, data from other European Countries will complement the insights gained. This will help to understand the similarities and differences between these countries, which have specific differences in their health care systems. This can lead to subsequent activities in the different countries to improve the clinical care of people living with diabetes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Brandt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34eac9c07852e0af98528https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261436830
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real-World Evidence Should Be Used in Regulatory Decisions About New Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Products for Diabetes2019 · 42 citations
  2. 2A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare2025 · 53 citations
  3. 3Technology Integration: The Role of the Diabetes Care and Education Specialist in Practice2020 · 56 citations
  4. 4Development of a Diabetes Navigator Toolkit to Support Diabetes Technology Uptake: The IMPACT Toolkit2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Effect of automated insulin delivery systems on person-reported outcomes in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis2024 · 46 citations