PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 7, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Topological structure and influencing factors of the spatial CO₂ emission network in Chinese cities

FYFengmei YangXZXuefang ZhangNWNian Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the spatial characteristics and driving factors of CO₂ emissions in Chinese cities.
  • Analyzed data from 334 Chinese cities using an adjusted gravity model.
  • Constructed a carbon emission spatial correlation network (CESCN).
  • Employed social network analysis (SNA) to study network structure and dynamics.
  • Examined changes between 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020.
  • CESCN exhibits high resilience, low density, and weak hierarchy overall.
  • Major cities like Shanghai and Shenzhen function as core hubs in the network.
  • The core-periphery structure evolved from geographic to economic drivers.
  • Geographical distance and economic disparities inhibit CESCN formation, while industrial structure promotes it.

Abstract

Investigating the spatial correlation characteristics of CO2 emissions is crucial for promoting regional collaborative emission reduction. This study examines 334 Chinese cities, employing an adjusted gravity model to construct a carbon emission spatial correlation network (CESCN). Utilizing social network analysis (SNA) methods, it systematically examines the network structure characteristics, dynamic evolution patterns across 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, and the driving factors for 2020. Key findings include: (1) China’s CESCN exhibits overall characteristics of “high resilience, low density, and weak hierarchy.” Inter-city carbon emission linkages are predominantly passively driven by macroeconomic activities, while networks based on proactive collaborative emission reduction remain underdeveloped. (2) The network demonstrates distinct node role differentiation and spatial clustering, with eastern coastal developed cities like Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and Suzhou serving as core hubs. (3) The network’s core-periphery structure underwent a clear evolution from being primarily geographically driven to being economically driven, with the core zone stabilizing in the more economically developed eastern region. (4) geographical distance, disparities in economic development levels, and differences in population size inhibit the formation of CESCN; conversely, variations in industrial structure and carbon intensity exert a positive promoting effect. By constructing a more comprehensive urban sample network, this research deepens the understanding of the overall spatial correlation patterns of China’s CO2 emissions, providing empirical evidence and decision-making references for optimizing regional low-carbon collaborative governance policies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d49fe5b33cc4c35a22854chttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45785-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper