PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 7, 2014Heart and Vessels32 citationsOpen Access

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy using an innovative ventilator for patients with chronic heart failure: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study (SAVIOR-R)

SMShin‐ichi MomomuraYSYoshihiko SeinoYKYasuki Kihara

Structured PICO

Does home adaptive servo-ventilation therapy improve symptoms and hemodynamics in patients with chronic heart failure?

P
Population
115 Japanese patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who underwent home adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy for the first time. Most were NYHA class II (44.4%) and III (40.7%).
I
Intervention
Home adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy
O
Outcome
Changes in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)surrogate

Home adaptive servo-ventilation therapy may improve symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chronic heart failure, regardless of sleep-disordered breathing severity.

Limitations

  • Retrospective observational design
  • Lack of randomized control group

Abstract

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy using an innovative ventilator-originally developed to treat sleep-disordered breathing (SDB)-is a novel modality of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and is gaining acceptance among Japanese cardiologists in expectation of its applicability to treat patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) based on its acute beneficial hemodynamic effects. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, real-world observational study in 115 Japanese patients with CHF, who had undergone home ASV therapy for the first time from January through December 2009, to examine their profile and the effects on their symptoms and hemodynamics. Medical records were used to investigate New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and other variables. Most of the patients were categorized to NYHA classes II (44.4 %) and III (40.7 %). SDB severity was not determined in 44 patients, and SDB was not detected or was mild in 27 patients. In at least 71 patients (61.7 %), therefore, ASV therapy was not applied for the treatment of SDB. CHF was more severe, i.e., greater NYHA class, lower LVEF, and higher CTR, in 87 ASV-continued patients (75.7 %) than in 28 ASV-discontinued patients (24.3 %). However, SDB severity was not related to continuity of ASV. The combined proportion of NYHA classes III and IV (P = 0.012) and LVEF (P = 0.009) improved significantly after ASV therapy. CTR and BNP did not improve significantly after ASV therapy but showed significant beneficial changes in their time-course analysis (P < 0.05, respectively). Improvements in LVEF and NYHA class after ASV therapy were not influenced by SDB severity at onset. The present study suggests that ASV therapy would improve the symptoms and hemodynamics of CHF patients, regardless of SDB severity. A randomized clinical study to verify these effects is warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Momomura et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56dce75589c71d767d0c0https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-014-0558-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper