PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Public Administration Review0 citationsOpen Access

Interpersonal Connections and Career Mobility in Bureaucratic Labor Markets: Evidence From Brazil

View Full Paper
DCDanilo CardosoFCFlávio CirenoJLJulien Labonne

Key Points

  • This research explores how interpersonal connections influence career trajectories within bureaucracies in Brazil.
  • Constructed measures of interpersonal connections for over 440,000 Brazilian federal civil servants
  • Analyzed data from 2000 to 2018
  • Examined effects of connections to peers versus political patrons
  • Assessed variation across different demographic groups
  • Stronger connections to peers, not bosses, drive career mobility
  • Connections to higher-ranking officers and party members also impact trajectories
  • Patterns are similar for politically appointed and career positions
  • Demographic variations in network influence are observed

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interpersonal networks are pervasive in state bureaucracies around the world. To what extent do they explain bureaucratic career trajectories? And are they driven more by political patronage and connections to influential bosses, or by information‐sharing and trust‐building among peers? We address these questions by constructing measures of the stock of interpersonal connections for the universe of over 440,000 Brazilian federal civil servants for the period 2000–2018. Individuals' networks strongly predict their future career mobility. Connections to higher‐ranking officers or to members of the same political party have a strong effect, but the overall influence of individuals' networks on their career trajectories is dominated by non‐political connections to their peers, not connections to bosses or party colleagues. We show that these patterns are similar for politically appointed and career positions, and explore heterogeneity across various demographic groups. We discuss implications for theory and policy, as well as potential wider methodological applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cardoso et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f00974eaea4b11a79925https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70116
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper