PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications0 citations

Microstructural, mechanical and corrosion behaviour of dissimilar Hastelloy C-22/Nitronic 50 welds: Effect of ERNiCrMo-4 filler and autogenous welding

View Full Paper
RJRahul JibhakateSRSangharatna M. RamtekeSSSumitra Sharma

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the effects of welding methods and filler material on the properties of dissimilar metal welds between Hastelloy C-22 and Nitronic 50.
  • Gas tungsten arc welding of Hastelloy C-22 and Nitronic 50
  • Comparison of autogenous vs. ERNiCrMo-4 filler-assisted welding
  • Microstructural assessment via optical and scanning electron microscopy
  • Energy-dispersive spectroscopy for elemental analysis
  • Corrosion testing to evaluate resistance to intergranular attack.
  • Autogenous welds showed fine columnar dendritic structures, while filler-assisted welds contained coarser grain formations.
  • Ultimate tensile strength of filler-assisted welds was 817 MPa compared to 709 MPa for autogenous welds.
  • Impact toughness was higher for filler-assisted welds (37.17 J) than for autogenous welds (15.21 J).
  • Filler-assisted welds exhibited a 12.66% sensitization degree versus 14.78% for autogenous welds, indicating better corrosion resistance.

Abstract

The welding of dissimilar alloys is technically challenging due to mismatches in melting range, solidification behaviour, and thermal expansion, which predispose joints to segregation, cracking, and formation of deleterious phases. In advanced industrial sectors such as chemical processing, power generation, and oil & gas, the joining of nickel-based superalloys with nitrogen-strengthened stainless steels offers an attractive balance of corrosion resistance, mechanical performance, and cost efficiency. Therefore, this study examines the gas tungsten arc welding of Hastelloy C-22, a Ni-Cr-Mo superalloy, with Nitronic 50, an austenitic stainless steel, comparing autogenous welding with ERNiCrMo-4 filler-assisted welding. Microstructural assessment by optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, complemented by energy-dispersive spectroscopy, revealed distinct solidification modes. Autogenous welds exhibited a predominantly fine columnar dendritic fusion zone, whereas filler-assisted welds contained a mixture of columnar and equiaxed dendrites with coarser grain morphology. Both joint types showed pronounced elemental redistribution at the interfaces, with evidence of grain boundary migration. Filler-assisted welds further promoted the precipitation of secondary Ni-Mo-rich Laves and μ phases within interdendritic regions, absent in autogenous welds, signifying complex segregation phenomena associated with filler addition. Mechanically, ERNiCrMo-4 welds achieved superior ultimate tensile strength (817 MPa) and impact toughness (37.17 J) compared to autogenous welds (709 MPa and 15.21 J, respectively). Despite promoting secondary phases, the filler metal minimized macro segregation and enhanced weld bead uniformity. Corrosion tests revealed a lower degree of sensitization for filler-assisted welds (12.66%) compared to autogenous welds (14.78%), indicating improved resistance to intergranular attack. These findings clarify the interplay between welding method, filler chemistry, and microstructural evolution in Hastelloy-stainless steel dissimilar joints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jibhakate et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f0d774eaea4b11a7a392https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207261437592
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper