PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Journal of orthopaedic surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Predictors of re-biopsy in percutaneous musculoskeletal tumor biopsies: A single-center retrospective cohort study

View Full Paper
AYAli YücesanYAYavuz ArıkanFDFatih Mert Doğukan

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous biopsies for musculoskeletal tumors and identify factors predicting the need for re-biopsy.
  • Retrospective analysis of 565 patients undergoing biopsies from 2020 to 2024.
  • Assessment of factors like lesion size, depth, location using logistic regression.
  • Evaluation of the role of multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultation.
  • Initial diagnostic yield of 65.5%.
  • Lesion width <2 cm and interventional radiologist performing the biopsy are strong predictors for re-biopsy.
  • MDT evaluation prevented re-biopsy in 38 of 72 cases (52.8%).

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic success of percutaneous biopsies performed for suspected musculoskeletal tumors and to identify clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors associated with the need for repeat biopsy (re-biopsy). The secondary objective was to assess the impact of multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation on reducing unnecessary re-biopsy procedures.MethodsA total of 565 patients (331 bone, 234 soft tissue lesions) who underwent percutaneous biopsy for suspected musculoskeletal tumors between 2020 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic success was defined as a biopsy yielding a definitive histopathological diagnosis sufficient to guide treatment planning without additional tissue sampling. Predictive factors including lesion size, depth, location, and performing specialty were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.ResultsThe initial diagnostic yield was 65.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that lesion width p = 0.009) and biopsy performed by an interventional radiologist (compared to an orthopedic surgeon) (OR = 5.25; 95% CI, 2.83-9.74; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of re-biopsy recommendation. Among 72 patients recommended for re-biopsy, MDT evaluation averted the need for a second procedure in 38 cases (52.8%).ConclusionSmaller lesion size (<2 cm) and the medical specialty performing the biopsy were independent predictors of re-biopsy recommendation, with the latter likely reflecting systematic differences in case complexity and procedural environment rather than operator skill. Structured MDT evaluation significantly reduced unnecessary repeat procedures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yücesan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f0d774eaea4b11a7a498https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536261439408
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper