PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026International Migration0 citationsOpen Access

Integration and Multi‐Level Governance in Turkey's Small Towns: An Actor Centred Analysis 1

View Full Paper
KBKristen Sarah BiehlMAMeral AçıkgözZBZeynep Ceren Eren Benlisoy

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the dynamics of refugee integration governance in Turkey's small towns within a multi-level governance framework.
  • Conducted 24 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in refugee integration.
  • Analyzed policies related to refugee governance.
  • Applied an actor-centred multi-level governance framework to understand interactions among various actors.
  • Integration governance is influenced by centralized authority and limited local autonomy.
  • Informal coordination and personal ties are crucial for governance outcomes.
  • Two distinct governance configurations emerged: one cautious and the other exclusionary.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines how refugee integration is governed in Turkey's small towns, where strong centralization, local discretion, and informal practices intersect. Drawing on an actor‐centred multi‐level governance (MLG) framework, it analyzes interactions among Provincial Directorates of Migration Management, municipalities, non‐governmental organizations, and refugee opinion leaders in two geographically, politically, and socioeconomically distinct small‐town contexts. Based on 24 semi‐structured interviews and policy analysis, the study shows that while integration governance in both towns is shaped by centralized authority and limited local autonomy, it unfolds through informal coordination, selective visibility, and reliance on personal ties. At the same time, important differences emerge in how local actors respond to these constraints, with one case producing a more cautious and the other a more exclusionary governance configuration. Overall, by focusing on small towns rather than metropolitan centres, the article demonstrates how urban scale magnifies political risk, informality and dependence on intermediary actors. In doing so, it advances a more differentiated and scale‐sensitive understanding of multi‐level governance under conditions of centralization and constrained local capacity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Biehl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f10974eaea4b11a7a92dhttps://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70163
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Refugee voices vs. humanitarian choices: how much can refugee-led organizations redefine power and agency in post-2019 Lebanon?2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Governance through discipline in the neighbourhood: Syrian refugees and Turkish citizens in urban life2021 · 17 citations
  3. 3From social capital to social cohesion: Syrian refugees in Turkey and the role of NGOs as intermediaries2022 · 44 citations
  4. 4The Multilevel Governance of Migration and Integration2015 · 305 citations
  5. 5Two worlds apart?2018 · 4 citations