PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 8, 2026Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal0 citationsOpen Access

‘Comparative study between the use of topical glyceryl trinitrate versus topical calcium channel blocker (diltiazem) in treatment of chronic anal fissure’

View Full Paper
MEMohamed A. Abd El-RahimAAAbd Al-Kareem E. Abd Al-KareemFFFathy M. Fathy

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the effectiveness of topical diltiazem and glyceryl trinitrate in treating chronic anal fissures.
  • Conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial with 80 participants aged 18–60 years
  • Divided participants into two groups: one received 2% diltiazem and the other 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate
  • Measured healing rates, recurrence, and side effects over a follow-up period
  • At 6 weeks, complete healing occurred in 80% of the diltiazem group and 75% of the glyceryl trinitrate group
  • Recurrence rates were 10% for diltiazem and 12.5% for glyceryl trinitrate at 24 weeks
  • Side effects were more common in the glyceryl trinitrate group, with headaches reported in 67.5% of patients

Abstract

Background and aim An Anal fissure is a painful tear, often from constipation or childbirth. In chronic cases, healing is delayed due to muscle spasm. Topical glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) and diltiazem (DTZ) help by relaxing the muscle, with DTZ often performing better. This study aimed to compare the effect of topical DTZ 2% and GTN 0.2% in the treatments of chronic anal fissure. Patients and methods This prospective randomized clinical trial included 80 patients (18–60 years) with chronic anal fissure at Al-Azhar Assiut from November 2023. Patients were randomly separated into two groups: one managed with 2% DTZ ointment, the other with 0.2% GTN ointment. Results Before treatment, the main presenting symptoms were constipation, pain, and bleeding. Posterior fissures were found in 90.1% of patients, with skin tags in 75% and sphincter spasm in 62.5%. At 6 weeks, complete healing occurred in 80% of the DTZ group and 75% of the GTN group ( P >0.05). Recurrence rates at 24 weeks were 10% in the DTZ group versus 12.5% in the GTN group. More side effects were reported in the GTN group, notably headache (67.5 vs. 22.5%; P < 0.001). Healing at 8 weeks was comparable (78% DTZ vs. 82.5% GTN; P = 0.775). Pain decreased in both groups with no significant difference throughout follow-up. Conclusion Both DTZ 2% ointment and GTN 0.2% ointment are effective. DTZ showed slightly better healing and fewer headaches, but the difference was not significant.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

El-Rahim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5f13674eaea4b11a7ac4chttps://doi.org/10.4103/azmj.azmj_68_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper