Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this article, we compare the artificial intelligence strategies of China and the European Union, assessing the key similarities and differences regarding what the high-level aims of each governance strategy are, how the development and use of AI is promoted in the public and private sectors, and whom these policies are meant to benefit. We characterize China’s strategy by its primary focus on fostering innovation and a more recent emphasis on “common prosperity,” and the EU’s on promoting ethical outcomes through protecting fundamental rights. Building on this comparative analysis, we consider the areas where the EU and China could learn from and improve upon each other’s approaches to AI governance to promote more ethical outcomes. We outline policy recommendations for both European and Chinese policymakers that would support them in achieving this aim.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Huw Roberts
Josh Cowls
Emmie Hine
The Information Society
University of Oxford
The Alan Turing Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roberts et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6c6d8f174babf6cab382d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2022.2124565