PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2016The Journal of Technology Transfer103 citationsOpen Access

Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: a review and critical discussion

CSChristian SandströmKWKarl WennbergMWMartin W. Wallin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article provides a critical review and discussion of current literature on technology transfer, incubators, and academic entrepreneurship. Drawing upon the notion of robustness in social systems and public choice theory, we review, code, and taxonomize 166 studies to assess the likelihood that these initiatives will generate innovation and economic growth. We find that academic entrepreneurship initiatives are characterized by conflicting goals, weak incentive structures for universities and academics, and are contextually dependent upon factors such as university strength. Our results suggest that there are critical boundary conditions that are unlikely to be fulfilled when universities and policymakers enact policies to support academic entrepreneurship initiatives. Policymakers therefore need to be cautious in the potential design of such initiatives. We discuss how technology transfer from universities might be better achieved through alternative mechanisms such as contract research, licensing, consulting and increased labor mobility among researchers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sandström et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7dab961e2ce1627d183dchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9536-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities1998 · 270 citations
  2. 2Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies1996 · 77 citations
  3. 3High‐technology clustering through spin‐out and attraction: The Cambridge case2005 · 219 citations
  4. 4University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe2008 · 218 citations
  5. 5Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change2006 · 590 citations