PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2023EuroIntervention11 citationsOpen Access

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk: rationale and design of the randomised DEDICATE Trial

MSMoritz SeiffertRVReinhard VontheinHBHelmut Baumgartner

Structured PICO

Does TAVI provide non-inferior or superior outcomes compared to SAVR in low- to intermediate-risk patients aged 65 years or older with severe aortic stenosis?

P
Population
Approximately 1,404 patients aged 65 years or older with severe aortic stenosis at low to intermediate surgical risk, eligible for both TAVI and SAVR.
I
Intervention
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
C
Comparator
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)
O
Outcome
Composite of mortality or stroke at 1 year and 5 yearscomposite

The DEDICATE-DZHK6 trial is designed to evaluate the non-inferiority and superiority of TAVI versus SAVR regarding mortality or stroke at 1 and 5 years in low- to intermediate-risk patients aged 65 years or older with severe aortic stenosis.

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the preferred treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and for older patients irrespective of risk. However, in younger, low-risk patients for whom both therapeutic options, TAVI and SAVR, are applicable, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial, as data on long-term outcomes remain limited. The DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial is an investigator-initiated, industry-independent, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TAVI compared to SAVR in low- to intermediate-risk patients aged 65 years or older. To evaluate both treatment strategies, approximately 1,404 patients determined eligible for both TAVI and SAVR by the interdisciplinary Heart Team were randomised to TAVI or SAVR. Broad inclusion and strict exclusion criteria targeted an all-comers patient population. Procedures were performed according to local best practice with contemporary routine medical devices. The primary endpoints are a composite of mortality or stroke at 1 year and 5 years in order to incorporate midterm efficacy results and complement early safety data. Primary outcomes will be tested sequentially for non-inferiority and superiority. The DEDICATE-DZHK6 Trial has been designed to mirror clinical reality for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis and provide unique information on overall outcomes after TAVI and SAVR that can be directly applied to clinical routines. Its results will help further define optimal treatment strategies for low- to intermediate-risk patients in whom both TAVI and SAVR are currently advisable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Seiffert et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7e66a5c3030ff03d18108https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-23-00232
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Self-expanding Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients2022 · 195 citations
  2. 2Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement2020 · 838 citations
  3. 3Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk2021 · 326 citations
  4. 4Effect of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Aortic Stenosis2022 · 189 citations
  5. 5Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis2015 · 934 citations