What question did this study set out to answer?

Evaluate the impact of stratified treatment based on MINOCA causes compared to standard care on angina status after one year.

April 10, 2026

In MINOCA, stratified treatment guided by MINOCA cause vs. standard care improved angina status at 1 y

Key Result

Stratified treatment guided by MINOCA cause improved angina status at 1 year compared to standard care in patients with MINOCA.

Key Points

Evaluate the impact of stratified treatment based on MINOCA causes compared to standard care on angina status after one year.
Guided treatment using identified causes of MINOCA
Comparison with standard care approaches
Assessment of angina status over one year
Patients receiving stratified treatment showed significant improvement in angina status
Contrast with standard care revealed less efficacy
Enhanced outcomes suggest a tailored approach may be beneficial

Abstract

GIM/FP/GP:Formula: see text Cardiology:Formula: see text.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Giulio Francesco Romiti

Bernadette Corica

Journals

Annals of Internal Medicine

Actions

Institutions

Sapienza University of Rome

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Romiti et al. (Mon,) reported a other. Stratified treatment guided by MINOCA cause improved angina status at 1 year compared to standard care in patients with MINOCA.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8930e6c1944d70ce04224 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-26-00758-jc

In MINOCA, stratified treatment guided by MINOCA cause vs. standard care improved angina status at 1 y

Key Result

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study