As Europe accelerates toward climate neutrality, the phase-out of diesel trains creates an urgent need for cost-effective alternatives on non-electrified railway lines. With over 40% of the network still lacking electrification, regional services face a critical decarbonization challenge. This study introduces a geospatial techno-economic framework to identify cost-optimal strategies for regional passenger rail, integrating high-resolution network data, demand estimation, lifetime costs modeling, and emissions assessment. Three archetypes emerge: (i) short low-traffic lines favor battery; (ii) long low-traffic lines favor hydrogen, provided that hydrogen prices decline to approximately €5–6/kg; and (iii) dense high-traffic lines favor electrification. The results indicate that no single propulsion technology can simultaneously minimize costs across heterogeneous line conditions. In particular, a single-technology strategy leads to significant economic penalties, increasing Total Cost of Ownership by 10–30%. Furthermore, under the cost-optimal configuration, well-to-wheel carbon emissions can be reduced by up to 90% compared to a diesel-only baseline. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that only a diversified technology mix can ensure a successful and economically sustainable transition toward zero‑carbon regional rail. • A geospatial framework identifies cost-optimal rail decarbonization strategies. • Batteries suit short routes, hydrogen long ones, electrification dense lines. • Single-technology strategies raise total costs by up to 30%. • Cost-optimal portfolios reduce well-to-wheel carbon emissions by up to 90%. • Hydrogen competitiveness strongly depends on future fuel cost reductions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gabriele Peyrani
Paolo Marocco
Marta Gandiglio
Applied Energy
Polytechnic University of Turin
Costruzioni Apparecchiature Elettroniche Nucleari (Italy)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peyrani et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893406c1944d70ce04523 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127817