Background: Strength training (ST) is essential for enhancing athletic performance and reducing injury risk, yet traditional monitoring relies heavily on subjective assessment, limiting objective and individualized evaluation. Objective: This scoping review critically synthesizes current applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and wearable technologies (WT) in ST, with emphasis on methodological approaches, data characteristics, explainability, and practical readiness. Methods: Searches of PubMed and Scopus identified 13 peer-reviewed studies (2015–2025). Evidence was charted and synthesized to compare AI models, wearable sensor configurations, validation strategies, and translational potential. Results: Studies employed classical machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid approaches alongside inertial, force, strain, and physiological sensors to support exercise classification, load estimation, fatigue detection, and performance monitoring. Deep learning models dominated movement recognition tasks, whereas simpler models often aligned better with small datasets and interpretability requirements. However, most studies relied on limited, homogeneous samples and internal validation, restricting generalizability and real-world applicability. Explainability was inconsistently addressed, particularly in higher-risk applications such as injury prediction. Conclusions: AI-enhanced wearables provide objective and individualized ST monitoring, but current evidence remains largely experimental. To ensure a practical application is implemented, standardized datasets, robust external validation, and greater integration of explainable AI are required to support and deliver trustworthy decision-making.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eleftherios Fyntikakis
Spyridon Plakias
Themistoklis Tsatalas
Applied Sciences
University of Thessaly
Democritus University of Thrace
University of Derby
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fyntikakis et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893896c1944d70ce0492c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073565