What question did this study set out to answer?

The review aims to compare regulatory standards for regenerative medicine across different continents.

April 10, 2026

Regenerative Medicine Regulations: A Tri-continental Comparison ofPolicies and Progress

Key Points

The review aims to compare regulatory standards for regenerative medicine across different continents.
Comparative analysis of regulatory frameworks in various regions
Assessment of the accessibility of regenerative therapies
Evaluation of safety and efficacy standards in emerging markets
Identified significant regulatory gaps in emerging markets like India
Highlighted the need for international collaboration to standardize regulations
Emphasized that harmonization could improve access to safe and effective therapies globally

Abstract

This comparative review underscores the importance of harmonizing regulatory standards to ensure equitable access to regenerative therapies worldwide. International collaboration, knowledge sharing, and capacity building are crucial for bridging existing gaps, particularly in emerging markets like India, and for maintaining high standards of safety and efficacy globally.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Ghatak et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce049ac — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871423172251215053447

Authors

Prateek Ghatak

Devesh Kumar

Thakur Gurjeet Singh

Journals

Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

Actions

Institutions

Chitkara University

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Regenerative Medicine Regulations: A Tri-continental Comparison ofPolicies and Progress

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion