Gallium (Ga) in coal is a nationally emerging strategic mineral resource, yet research on using petrophysical methods to detect the spatial variation in critical metals in coal seams remains limited. Analyzing the distribution characteristics of Ga-rich coal using geophysical well-logging methods is of great significance for the development and utilization of Ga. This study introduces a quantitative method for predicting Ga-rich laminations in ultra-thick bituminous coal seams by integrating: (i) wireline-log-based lithofacies classification, (ii) lithofacies-constrained mineral inversion, and (iii) lithofacies-constrained and laboratory-established Ga–mineral correlations. The coal seam was first classified into four distinct lithofacies types—(i) parting, (ii) medium-ash coal (MA), (iii) low-ash coal (LA), and (iv) extra-low-ash coal (ELA)—through integration of conventional wireline log interpretation, cluster analysis, and XGBoost machine learning. Second, lithofacies-constrained Ga–host mineral associations were established by integrating core sample analysis, correlation analysis, and linear regression modeling. Third, mineral content predictions for each lithofacies were obtained through wireline-log-based mineral inversion, constrained by petrophysical boundaries. Finally, prediction uncertainties were evaluated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation, while Ga-rich laminations were predicted by integrating log-derived mineral inversion results with regressed Ga prediction models. The results demonstrate strong agreement between mineral inversion and XRD analyses within uncertainty ranges, achieving a prediction accuracy of 73.6% for Ga. This validated methodology presents a novel approach for quantifying Ga concentrations in coal, as demonstrated through a case study.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wei Li
Tongjun Chen
Xuanyu Liu
Minerals
China University of Mining and Technology
China Shenhua Energy (China)
Shenhua Group (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce049d7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min16040387
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: