AbstractBackground and purpose Accurate segmentation of the urethra is crucial for safe focal dose escalated radiotherapy, while prostate zone identification is important for prostate cancer diagnosis. Manual delineations on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are labour-intensive and variable, and while deep learning offers promise in automating this process, no available solution currently exists. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of the urethra, prostate and all prostate zones and benchmark its performance against inter-reader variability and assess generalisability to external data from a different MRI vendor. Materials and methods The public datasets ProstateZones and PROSTATEx included 200 magnetic resonance images with manual delineations, with 160 used for training/validation and 40 with independent duplicate segmentations used as a test set. A nnU-Net deep learning model was evaluated on the unseen test set and externally validated on a dataset with 55 samples. Performance was assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Surface DSC, percentile Symmetric Surface Distance, and Center Line Distance (CLD) metrics. Results The model outperformed the inter-reader variability on multiple structures, and notably on all metrics for the urethra, with median CLD values of 2.8 and 2.9 mm compared to 3.6 mm for inter-reader variability. External validation showed robust generalisability to a dataset collected from a different vendor. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a deep learning model can achieve expert-level performance in automated segmentation of the urethra, prostate, and prostate zones. Robust performance on external data highlighted potential as a decision support solution.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William Holmlund
Attila Simkó
Karin Söderkvist
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Umeå University
Skåne University Hospital
University of Szeged
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Holmlund et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893a86c1944d70ce04af4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2026.100964