What question did this study set out to answer?

April 10, 2026Open Access

Comparative diagnostic performance of advanced endoscopic techniques in suspected sarcoidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Key Points

Evaluate the diagnostic performance of advanced endoscopic techniques for sarcoidosis.
Conducted a systematic review
Performed a network meta-analysis
Assessed diagnostic techniques: EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TMC
EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TMC may provide better diagnostic accuracy for sarcoidosis
Evidence quality is low, warranting cautious interpretation
Emphasis on individualized clinical decision-making based on patient condition

Abstract

In centres with appropriate expertise, EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TMC may offer superior diagnostic performance for sarcoidosis. However, given the low certainty of evidence, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Clinical decisions should be individualised, considering the patient's condition when determining the final diagnostic strategy.

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Authors

Sheng-Ping Li

Yan Luo

Xin-Bin Liu

Journals

Pulmonology

Actions

Institutions

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Integrated Chinese Medicine (China)

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Comparative diagnostic performance of advanced endoscopic techniques in suspected sarcoidosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study