This article explores the possibility that Menelaus, the Jewish high priest, was not of Aaronic descent. While in 2 Macc. 3:4–6 Simon, Menelaus’ brother, is described as being ‘from the tribe of Benjamin’, most scholars, relying on a few versions of the Old Latin, argue that it should instead be translated as ‘from the priestly clan of Bilgah’. And yet a careful examination of the surviving versions of the Old Latin reveals that ‘Bilgah’ appears to be an interpretive modification aimed at justifying how a non-Aaronite could become high priest. Moreover, the Greek term phylê cannot denote a priestly division. Furthermore, the assumption that Simon was appointed as an overseer of the Temple does not necessarily indicate that he was a priest. Additional passages from 1 Maccabees and the Testament of Moses may also be interpreted as supporting the argument that Menelaus was not of Aaronic descent.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuele Rocca
Journal of Jewish Studies
Ariel University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samuele Rocca (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893c96c1944d70ce04b4f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/jjs.2026.77.1.24