We derive brane-effective electromagnetism from a localized 4+1 Maxwell sector embedded in the unified toy model. The gauge field is a bulk potential AM with kinetic term −Z(w)FMNFMN/(4μ0), where the transverse profile Z(w) localizes gauge dynamics near the brane at w = 0. Varying the action yields the localized Maxwell equations ∂M(ZFMN) + ξ−1∂N(∂·A) = μ0JN, the Bianchi identities, and an exact divergence consistency identity linking the gauge condition to current conservation. For brane-localized conserved sources, axial gauge, and a brane-dominant zero mode, integrating over w reduces the theory to standard 3+1 Maxwell with an effective coupling μ0eff = μ0/Zint, where Zint = ∫−∞∞Z(w) dw. For a Gaussian profile Z(w) = e−w2/λ2, μ0eff = μ0/(λ√π) and the transverse Sturm–Liouville problem yields a discrete KK tower with masses mn2 = 2n/λ2 and a brane parity selection rule. The resulting static brane potential is Coulomb plus Yukawa-suppressed corrections with a fixed coefficient pattern; the leading deviation scales as 1/2 e−2r/λ. For time-dependent sources, the brane-to-brane response depends only on the Lorentz scalar k2 (with the retarded prescription), ensuring brane Lorentz covariance; massive modes add causal tail terms inside the light cone. Finally, a minimally coupled brane matter model yields a conserved Noether current and an off-shell identity that supplies the Maxwell source consistency condition. In the updated charge ontology, a fixed defect branch carries q* = ηQe* with ηQ = ±1, while canonical normalization of the reduced zero mode gives qeff = q*/√Zint; circulation is not used to define electric charge, and the zero-mode Maxwell limit suppresses the mixed (Aw, Jw, Fμw) sector only as a controlled far-field approximation. All principal identities and reductions are backed by a compact Wolfram Language referee suite.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Trevor Norris
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Trevor Norris (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8940c6c1944d70ce05043 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19449834