Abstract This article interrogates the formation of a national political consensus around coal in the United States. In the postwar era, the domestic future of coal was seriously challenged by the oil, gas, and nuclear alternatives. In less than two decades, however, coal mining shifted from being one of multiple energy options to being a national political project tied to regional development and energy sovereignty. Why did this shift occur? Using archival data, I argue that it was not primarily a response to market forces or corporate pressures but was furthered through the work of the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). In the years following its inception in 1965, the agency articulated the coal consensus as both a solution to the problem of Appalachian underdevelopment and to the looming energy crisis. In doing so, it brought together the interests of regional, federal, and corporate actors around this consequential project. In this article, I delineate a pathway through which bureaucratic agencies can play a decisive role in the formation of political ideas and advance our understanding of the conditions that make energy transitions possible.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gabriel Lévesque
Social Science History
McGill University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gabriel Lévesque (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894ad6c1944d70ce05928 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2026.10128
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: