Abstract Stem crooks are critical stem defects that reduce timber quality and value. This study proposes a simulation pipeline for generating synthetic crooks in Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) point clouds and evaluates the performance of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on this dataset for detecting crooks in real-world TLS data. We introduced parameterized crook deformations into TLS-derived stems, producing 14 000 synthetic examples based on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees. The simulated crooks were represented in two patterns: single-and double-directional bends. Each stem was rasterized into 2D images from multiple vertical sections and viewpoints. We trained a YOLOv8s model exclusively on these synthetic images and tested its performance on an independently collected real-world TLS dataset containing 310 stems and 65 visually annotated crooks. The detector achieved F1-scores above 0.6 for low Intersection over Union (IoU) thresholds (0.3), demonstrating its ability to identify crooks despite domain differences between simulated and real point clouds. However, localization accuracy declined under stricter IoU criteria, with a mean Average Precision (mAP@50–95) of 0.24. Error patterns revealed more commission errors in upper stem regions and more omissions near the butt logs, reflecting branch complexity, point cloud sparsity, and limitations in lower-stem simulations. These results show that synthetic crook data can provide valuable training material for defect detection while also highlighting the challenges associated with using such synthetic data for model training.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Raul de Paula Pires
Nils Lindgren
Henrik Persson
Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Forestry Research Institute of Sweden
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pires et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8958f6c1944d70ce06a2f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpag026