Position-independent geometric errors crucially impact the accuracy of five-axis machine tools, yet their identification remains challenging due to computational complexities, inadequate measurement pose selection, and disturbances arising from thermal drift and residual uncompensated errors. Existing methods typically rely on linearized kinematic models, heuristic sampling of measurement poses, or computationally expensive global optimization procedures, which collectively limit their effectiveness in industrial environments. This study presents a unified identification framework that overcomes these limitations; it incorporates 3D offset parameters to enhance the decoupling of true geometric errors from non-PIGEs, an observability-driven measurement pose selection strategy to maximize the parameter sensitivity, and an ANN-surrogate model to accelerate high-dimensional global optimization. A genetic algorithm is used to optimize the measurement points based on the observability index of the machine tool. The ANN-surrogate model enhances the identification accuracy of error parameters (11 PIGEs + 3 offsets) through precise kinematic models, global exploration, and final refinement. Experimental validation on a five-axis machine tool demonstrates a volumetric error reduction of 88.615% after compensation, with RMSE decreasing to 0.4337 μm. Sensitivity analysis reveals that PIGEs contribute up to 75.26% of the total inaccuracy, while offset parameters capture 24.74% of the error from thermal and non-PIGE sources. The results confirm the method’s superiority over other techniques in terms of identification accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, providing a practical solution for high-precision applications in the manufacturing industries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Seth Osei
Wei Wang
Qicheng Ding
Machines
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu University of Technology
Qingdao University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Osei et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895a86c1944d70ce06b9f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040409