Does adenosine-enriched aortic root reperfusion improve clinical outcomes and reduce postoperative cardiac rhythm disturbances in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery?
60 patients undergoing valvular heart surgery
Adenosine-enriched aortic root reperfusion immediately prior to aortic declamping
Standard warm blood aortic root reperfusion
Perioperative clinical outcomes including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamping duration, mechanical ventilation, and antiarrhythmic/inotropic agent usage
Adenosine-enriched aortic root reperfusion prior to aortic declamping during valvular heart surgery does not improve procedural times and is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative arrhythmias requiring intervention compared to standard warm blood reperfusion.
Background: Adenosine is a vital medication in cardiac surgery, particularly in valvular heart procedures. While its use has been linked to improved postoperative cardiac function in some studies, there remains significant uncertainty regarding the optimal dosage for achieving the best clinical outcomes. This lack of consensus poses challenges for surgeons, perfusionists, and anesthesiologists alike. This study aims to explore the impact of adenosine on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing valvular heart surgery. Method: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted over a three-month period. Sixty patients undergoing valvular heart surgery were enrolled using a continuous sampling method and randomly allocated into two equal groups of 30 patients each. The intervention group received adenosine-enriched aortic root reperfusion immediately prior to aortic declamping, while the control group underwent standard warm blood aortic root reperfusion. Both groups were matched for demographic and clinical characteristics to ensure comparability. Results: Results indicated no significant differences in mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamping duration, or mechanical ventilation between the intervention and control groups. However, the intervention group that received adenosine had a higher rate of antiarrhythmic agent usage in the operating room (P<0.05). Inotropic agent usage was similar in both groups during surgery and in the ICU. Additionally, laboratory parameters on the first day of ICU admission were comparable between groups. Conclusion: Results in control group showed more favorable outcomes in terms of anti-arrhythmic drug usage, electroshock application, and arrhythmia prevalence. This study showed advantages for the standard warm blood aortic root reperfusion technique in managing post-operative cardiac rhythm disturbances.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Farshad Jalili Shahandashti
Farhad Gorjipour
Naser Kachoueian
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shahandashti et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8962d6c1944d70ce076ba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2026006/pdf