Organizational theory explains how systems fail and how they adapt. It does not adequately explain how they move, a gap increasingly visible in contemporary research on digital transformation and organizational inertia, where capability investment consistently fails to produce structural repositioning. This paper develops a state-transition model that fills that gap, integrating prior work on Acceleration Without Metabolization, Threshold-Constrained Equilibrium, and structural release into a unified dynamic system governed by the relationship between load, metabolization capacity, and adaptive degrees of freedom. The model introduces organizational motion as a theoretical primitive: the reallocation of metabolization capacity from equilibrium maintenance to positional change. This distinction matters because organizations can be highly active, continuously improving, or visibly destabilized without undergoing structural movement, and because the interventions each condition requires are categorically different. A central finding is that structural release, the mechanism through which constrained systems escape, carries a failure mode: when regained degrees of freedom exceed the system’s metabolization capacity, transformation produces renewed instability rather than change. The framework extends this logic across levels, advancing a structural equivalence claim between individual and organizational metabolization with implications for leadership formation and system design.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David S Morgan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David S Morgan (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896676c1944d70ce07d9f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19463887