This work presents a structured framework for understanding and engineering world peace within the formalism of Causal Theory (CT). Peace is not treated as the absence of conflict, nor as a purely moral or diplomatic construct, but as a multi-scale regime of causal coherence in which destructive gradients are reduced, closure remains possible across domains, and no critical subsystem is driven below viability. The framework is derived from a unified board architecture spanning atmosphere, biology, information and computation, cognition, social and economic systems, engineering, geology, and meta-level control. Across these domains, a common structural grammar emerges: capacities, loads, leakages, margins, emergent timescales, active regimes, shocks, attractors, recurrence, and closure. Peace is therefore formalized as a rectification process operating simultaneously across these coupled systems. The paper introduces several core principles. First, all persistent systems must balance expansion, correction, dissipation, and closure; failure to do so leads to instability or collapse. Second, peace must remain biologically admissible, preserving the conditions under which life can maintain recursive stability. Third, economic flows must align with coherence needs, establishing a hydrology in which resources move toward structural deficits rather than away from them. Fourth, information must be governed as a survivable field, not as an unbounded channel of noise. Fifth, transitions between regimes require structured dissipation and grief processing, as the loss of obsolete invariants cannot be bypassed without generating instability. Sixth, observable social reality must be distinguished from its projections, recognizing that public signals are filtered through measurement geometries. The framework also integrates attractor dynamics, thermodynamic regime analysis, and residue management, emphasizing that conflict and instability arise when unresolved structural residues accumulate or when systems are trapped in destructive attractors. A coherent peace must therefore construct deeper and more stable attractors than those associated with war, fragmentation, or extraction. Operationally, the paper outlines the structure of a Peace Board and a Peace Ledger. The Peace Board defines the governing constants and regimes of the system, while the Peace Ledger provides a measurable execution layer including observables, thresholds, margins, and intervention criteria. A rectification kernel is proposed as the minimal algorithmic structure required to detect deficits, apply corrective actions, and verify closure. This document does not claim to provide a fully calibrated geopolitical implementation. Instead, it establishes the theoretical and structural foundation required for such calibration. The next stage consists of aligning the framework with real-world data, active conflicts, and global system dynamics. Causal Peace is therefore not a static condition but a continuously maintained state of coherence, requiring ongoing adjustment, measurement, and structural closure across all levels of civilization.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Son David Bolduc (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896676c1944d70ce07daf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19463363
Son David Bolduc
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...