PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Communications Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

Forest loss persists despite certification and protection

View Full Paper
CTChris TaylorMEMaldwyn J. EvansDLDavid B. Lindenmayer

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of forest certification and protected areas in reducing global forest loss.
  • Analyzed satellite dataset on tree canopy removal from 2013 to 2023
  • Assessed associations between forest loss, certification, protection, and economic factors
  • Compared forest loss in certified vs. non-certified regions globally
  • Forest loss persisted globally with no decline in certified countries
  • Forest loss was lower in higher-income countries
  • Increased industrial roundwood and fuelwood production correlated with higher forest loss

Abstract

Forest loss is a significant global problem. Forest certification schemes and protected areas are two key approaches for improving forest conservation and management outcomes, but their effectiveness in reducing national-level forest loss remains unclear. Here, we analysed an 11-year high-resolution satellite dataset on tree canopy removal from 2013 to 2023 to assess associations between forest loss, certification, protection, and economic factors globally. We found that forest loss persisted globally with no evidence of decline in countries with higher levels of certification under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC). Forest loss was lower in higher-income countries (measured by gross domestic product per capita) and higher where industrial roundwood and fuelwood production was greater. While forest certification may improve management of certified forests, our results suggest limited effectiveness in reducing overall forest loss. Strengthening certification and protected-area strategies will be essential to slow global forest loss. Global forest loss continues with no evidence of reduction by certification or protection. Non-fire forest loss was positively associated with industrial roundwood and fuelwood production, and negatively associated with GDP per capita (2013–2023)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Taylor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e4d578050d08c1b751c6https://doi.org/10.1038/s44458-026-00055-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1FSC-certified forest management benefits large mammals compared to non-FSC2024 · 60 citations
  2. 2glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling2017 · 13,303 citations
  3. 3Protected Area Governance and Management2015 · 271 citations
  4. 4Are fire refugia less predictable due to climate change?2021 · 38 citations
  5. 5Technical Summary2023 · 168 citations