PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Revisiting price linkages between London and Shanghai base metal futures markets: A time-frequency connectedness analysis

View Full Paper
CPCunhai PanWSWei Shen

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to understand the price linkages between LME and SHFE base metal futures markets during recent global events.
  • Utilized time-varying parameter vector autoregressive frequency-based connectedness approach
  • Analyzed daily data from 2017 to 2024
  • Focused on four base metals: copper, nickel, aluminum, and zinc
  • LME contributes 42.82% to SHFE variance for copper, maintaining its global pricing benchmark role
  • SHFE absorbs 36.87% of short-term net spillover effects
  • SHFE’s price leadership has declined due to domestic and global factors
  • LME's influence increased during supply chain crises like the 2022 nickel short squeeze
  • SHFE's market responsiveness is limited by institutional barriers

Abstract

Against the backdrop of recent global events (including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, and escalating trade tensions), this paper revisits price linkages between the London Metal Exchange (LME) and the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) base metal futures markets. Utilizing a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive (TVP-VAR) frequency-based connectedness approach, we analyze daily data (2017–2024) to uncover dynamic spillovers across copper, nickel, aluminum, and zinc. The results demonstrate that the LME maintains its role as the global pricing benchmark, particularly for copper (42.82% contribution to SHFE variance), while the SHFE remains a net receiver, with short-term effects dominating (e.g., the SHFE market absorbs 36.87% of the short-term net spillover effects). Despite China’s internationalization efforts, the SHFE’s price leadership has declined relative to its historical position, reflecting the combined effects of domestic structural adjustments, institutional frictions, and major global shocks. Both markets exhibit event-specific sensitivities: the LME’s influence surged during supply chain crises (e.g., 2022 nickel short squeeze), while the SHFE’s responsiveness is constrained by institutional barriers. These findings underscore the LME’s role as a global pricing benchmark and urge policymakers in emerging economies to enhance market resilience through regulatory coordination, market development, and improved market transparency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e50778050d08c1b753efhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346602
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper