PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026AppliedChem1 citationsOpen Access

On Over-Parameterisation and Parameter Estimation of Enzyme Kinetics

View Full Paper
TWThomas WalugaPNParas Nagshi

Key Points

  • This research focuses on understanding how to effectively estimate parameters in enzyme kinetics models without falling into overparameterisation.
  • Utilized the total quasi-steady-state assumption
  • Increased parameters in a basic enzyme kinetics model successively
  • Applied a Bayesian optimisation approach to optimize experimental design
  • Found that multi-parameter models can be correctly identified under certain conditions
  • Detected instances where incorrect parameter values were estimated despite confidence intervals indicating accuracy
  • Highlighted the need to balance model complexity and parameter identifiability

Abstract

The estimation of kinetic parameters based on experiments is an important element in understanding the reaction mechanisms of enzymes and their intrinsic properties. However, increasing model complexity by introducing multiple parameters can lead to overparameterisation, resulting in poor parameter identifiability and potentially causing the model to describe noise rather than underlying biochemical mechanisms. In this study, we use the total quasi-steady-state assumption to clarify whether the parameters of multi-parameter models can be correctly identified even with a high number of parameters. Therefore, a basic model was used, and the number of parameters was increased successively. A Bayesian optimisation approach was applied, which predicted the next experiments with the highest information density in order to reduce the experimental effort required for the experiments. The results show, on the one hand, that the parameters of multi-parameter models can indeed be correctly identified. On the other hand, it also shows that under certain conditions, incorrect values were estimated, even though the consideration of confidence intervals suggested correct identification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Waluga et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e58f78050d08c1b75ca4https://doi.org/10.3390/appliedchem6020025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bottom-up parameterization of enzyme rate constants: Reconciling inconsistent data2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2The influence of experimental design on Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameter estimation: a systematic evaluation of regression methods2026
  3. 3Identifying kinetic models from reactor measurements2024
  4. 4Identifiability methods for biological systems: Determining subsets of parameters through sensitivity analysis, penalty-based optimisation, profile likelihood and LASSO model reduction2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Parameter grouping and co-estimation in physiologically based kinetic models using genetic algorithms2024