PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026eNeuro0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of TMS on the decoding and electrophysiology of priority in working memory

JFJacqueline M. FulvioBPBradley R. Postle

Key Points

  • This research examines how transcranial magnetic stimulation affects the processing of unprioritized and irrelevant memory items during working memory tasks.
  • Participants performed a double-serial retrocuing task with EEG recording while receiving spTMS to the right intraparietal sulcus.
  • EEG signals were analyzed to observe neural representations during the task and after spTMS delivery.
  • Multivariate pattern analysis was employed to assess the effects of spTMS on decodability of memory items.
  • spTMS restored the decodability of unprioritized memory items during stimulation and irrelevant items later on.
  • Low-beta oscillatory dynamics were identified as key to the effects observed post-stimulation.
  • Both spTMS and retrocuing produced phase shifts in the low-beta band, indicating a distinct neural mechanism for deprioritizing information.

Abstract

The flexible control of working memory (WM) requires prioritizing immediately task-relevant information while maintaining information with potential future relevance in a deprioritized state. Using double-serial retrocuing (DSR) with simultaneous EEG recording, we investigated how single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (spTMS) to right intraparietal sulcus impacts neural representations of unprioritized memory items (UMI), relative to irrelevant memory items (IMI) that are no longer needed for the trial. Twelve human participants (8 female) performed DSR plus a single-retrocue task, while spTMS was delivered during delay periods. Multivariate pattern analysis revealed that spTMS restored decodability of the UMI concurrent with stimulation, and that of the IMI several timesteps later, after the evoked effects of spTMS were no longer present in the EEG signal. This effect was carried by the alpha (8-13 Hz) and low-beta (13-20 Hz) frequency bands. Analyses of the raw EEG signal showed two effects selective to the epoch containing the UMI: the retrocue and spTMS each produced phase shifts in the low-beta band. These findings demonstrate that deprioritization involves active neural mechanisms distinct from the processing of the IMI, and that these are supported by low-beta oscillatory dynamics in parietal cortex. We hypothesize that the mechanism underlying spTMS-triggered involuntary retrieval of the UMI is the disruption of the encoding of priority status, which may depend on oscillatory dynamics in the low-beta band. Significance Statement This study provides key insights into how the brain maintains information at different levels of priority in working memory. Importantly, it shows how deprioritizing information in working memory is different from simply “dropping” it. By combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with high temporal resolution measurement of neural signals (with EEG), we replicate previous findings that spTMS triggers the involuntary retrieval of previously unprioritized information and provide new insight into how it does this. Specifically, at the level of EEG dynamics, spTMS is shown to uniquely alter oscillatory dynamics in the low-beta band.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fulvio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e5d178050d08c1b75fbchttps://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0346-25.2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of TMS on the decoding, electrophysiology, and representational geometry of priority in working memory2025
  2. 2Decoding auditory working memory content from EEG aftereffects of auditory-cortical TMS2024
  3. 3Effectiveness of <scp>rTMS</scp> on Working Memory and Inhibitory Impairments in Patients With Post‐Stroke Executive Deficits2026
  4. 4Internal Representations Are Prioritized by Frontoparietal Theta Connectivity and Suppressed by alpha Oscillation Dynamics: Evidence from Concurrent Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation EEG and Invasive EEG2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Stimulation success!? Improved response inhibition performance after prefrontal single-site and condition-and-perturb transcranial magnetic stimulation2026