PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Functionality as defence: A deep-structure hermeneutic study of institutional coping and professional identity during the COVID-19 pandemic

View Full Paper
BSBirgitta SchillerMGMarla GrunerEWEva Wimmer

Key Points

  • This article explores how healthcare professionals coped with psychosocial burdens during the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing challenges to their professional identity.
  • Conducted 13 qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals on COVID-19 wards.
  • Analyzed interviews using deep-structure hermeneutics to uncover latent meaning structures.
  • Performed an in-depth single-case analysis on one selected interview.
  • Healthcare professionals used rhetoric of positivity as a protective defense against anxiety and helplessness.
  • Functionality was identified as a mode of coping that restored a sense of agency while suppressing emotional needs.
  • The analysis revealed a paradox of maintaining composure at the risk of emotional detachment and exhaustion.

Abstract

This article examines how healthcare professionals working on COVID-19 wards experienced psychosocial burdens during the pandemic and how they managed these within the intersecting pressures of personal vulnerability, professional duty, and institutional expectation. Drawing on deep-structure hermeneutics, 13 qualitative interviews were analysed to explore latent meaning structures underlying professional discourse. From this corpus, one analytically rich interview was selected for an in-depth single-case analysis. It illustrates how a rhetoric of positivity and a strictly maintained professional role served as protective defences against anxiety, helplessness, and loss of control. Within this dynamic, functionality emerged as a latent mode of coping that re-established a sense of agency and order, yet simultaneously suppressed emotional expression and acknowledgement of personal needs. These findings reveal a psychosocial paradox at the heart of clinical work under crisis conditions: maintaining reliability and composure while risking emotional detachment and exhaustion. As a theoretically informed implication of these findings, we propose the potential value of "spaces of non-functioning"-temporary contexts that allow relief from performance demands without destabilising professional identity. Such protected spaces may provide a more sustainable balance between care for others and self-care within the culture of contemporary healthcare.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schiller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e5ec78050d08c1b762e7https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593261437508
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper