The Community‑Fragmentation Discrimination Primitive This paper formalizes discrimination as a structural output of social fragmentation rather than a moral or cultural phenomenon. It introduces community density as a measurable infrastructural variable that determines how descriptors, identities, and categories function within a society. In high‑density relational environments, descriptors remain contextual and relationally moderated; in fragmented Western environments, the same descriptors become stigmatizing because they operate without relational grounding and are interpreted through institutionalized categories of identity, risk, and power. The paper presents a full governance‑layer architecture of discrimination: a deep historical lineage of category formation, seven institutional pillars that stabilize stigma, a power‑integrated model explaining how fragmentation amplifies harm, and an operational translation layer that replaces identity categories with structural variables. It clarifies why discrimination intensifies when institutions mediate meaning, why category‑based governance reproduces harm, and why structural diagnostics are required to rebuild relational coherence.
Signal Rupture (2026) studied this question.