PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026Diagnosis1 citations

Examining atypical presentations associated with a higher risk of diagnostic errors using a new classification model

View Full Paper
YHYukinori HaradaTSTetsu SakamotoYWYuya Wada

Key Points

  • The aim is to apply a new classification model to identify atypical clinical presentations that are linked to higher diagnostic errors.
  • Analyzed cases of diagnostic errors from a systematic review using a new classification model.
  • Defined four atypical presentation patterns associated with diagnostic errors.
  • Described atypical group characteristics using DEER and RDC taxonomies.
  • Compared atypical presentations with typical presentations.
  • Of 382 analyzed cases, 36 (9.4%) were categorized as atypical presentations.
  • Atypical presentations had more frequent classifications of masking, equivocal results, and misdiagnosis.
  • No significant difference was found in DEER taxonomy codes between typical and atypical groups.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To apply a new classification model for clinical presentations and detect a new subtype of atypical presentations associated with a higher risk of diagnostic errors, using a dataset of diagnostic errors collected with disease-agnostic approaches. Methods We classified cases of diagnostic errors from a previous systematic review of case reports using a new classification model for clinical presentations. Based on a previous study, we defined four clinical presentation patterns as atypical presentations associated with a higher risk of diagnostic errors (atypical group). We described the characteristics of the atypical group, including codes from the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) and Reliable Diagnosis Challenges (RDC) taxonomies. We compared them with those of the most typical presentation (typical group). Results We included 382 cases in this study. The atypical groups accounted for 36 (9.4 %). For the RDC taxonomy, the codes “Atypical presentations”, “Findings masking/mimicking another diagnosis”, “Equivocal results/interpretation”, and “Recognizing misdiagnosis occurrence” were assigned more frequently in the atypical group. There was no difference in the distribution of DEER taxonomy codes between the two groups. Conclusions We detected atypical presentations associated with a higher risk of diagnostic errors by using the new model. Cases with such atypical presentations had more specific diagnostic challenges than those with the most typical presentation. The new model facilitates future studies to identify and address the target to reduce diagnostic errors in patients with atypical presentations associated with a higher risk of diagnostic errors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e64e78050d08c1b76a4chttps://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0179
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patterns of diagnostic errors using hierarchical cluster analysis: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine.2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Diagnostic errors in older patients: a secondary analysis of case reports2025
  3. 3Impact Analysis of Diagnostic Errors on Healthcare Delivery: A Systematic Review2025
  4. 4Evaluation of a Natural Language Processing Approach to Identify Diagnostic Errors and Analysis of Safety Learning System Case Review Data: Retrospective Cohort Study2024 · 3 citations
  5. 5Where Do We Go Wrong?2024