PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026npj Aging0 citationsOpen Access

Correlation between frailty status, surgical access, and outcomes in older adults with valvular heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery

PCPaolo CimagliaEMElisa MikusMTMichele Trichilo

Key Result

The addition of the Edmonton Frailty Scale to Euroscore II significantly improved prognostic accuracy for 1-year mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (Harrell's C +0.054, p<0.001).

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine the impact of frailty assessment on surgical outcomes and its importance in older adults with valvular heart disease.
  • Evaluated frailty status using various scales preoperatively.
  • Analyzed outcomes in patients aged 70 and above undergoing valve surgery.
  • Measured primary and secondary endpoints including all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalization.
  • Addition of Edmonton Frailty Scale to Euroscore II improved prognostic performance significantly.
  • MICS associated with reduced mortality in frail patients but not in composite endpoints.
  • Primary endpoint showed significant improvement with EFS (Harrell’s C + 0.054, p < 0.05).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=568)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does frailty assessment improve the prognostic performance of Euroscore II, and does minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) improve outcomes in frail older adults undergoing valve surgery?

P
Population
568 patients aged ≥70 years undergoing valve surgery, median age 76 years, median Euroscore II 2.3.
I
Intervention
Preoperative frailty assessment (Edmonton Frailty Scale, Clinical Frailty Scale, Essential Frailty Toolset) added to Euroscore II; Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS)
C
Comparator
Euroscore II alone; conventional surgery
O
Outcome
Composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 yearcomposite

Preoperative frailty assessment, particularly using the Edmonton Frailty Scale, improves risk stratification beyond Euroscore II, and minimally invasive cardiac surgery may reduce mortality in frail older adults undergoing valve surgery.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Harrell's C +0.054

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Observational design with potential for selection and information bias
  • Single-center study limiting generalizability
  • Thresholds of the scales and scores performed are not universally standardized
  • Potential inter- and intra-operator variability in scale evaluation
  • Presurgical risk assessment included only Euroscore II

Abstract

Frailty is not routinely assessed nor incorporated into the Euroscore II, and evidence on minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in older frail adults remains limited. We evaluated whether frailty assessment improves the prognostic performance of the Euroscore II and whether MICS provides benefits in frail patients. Patients aged ≥70 years undergoing valve surgery were assessed for frailty preoperatively. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year; the secondary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. A total of 568 patients were included (median age 76 years; median Euroscore II 2.3); 65.3% underwent elective surgery, and 63.4% MICS. For the primary endpoint, the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) provided the greatest improvement when added to Euroscore II (Harrell’s C + 0.054, p < 0.05), followed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (+0.013, p < 0.05). For mortality, EFS showed the largest gain (+0.057, p < 0.05), followed by the Essential Frailty Toolset (+0.011, p < 0.05). In frail patients, MICS was protective for mortality but not for the composite endpoint. Frailty assessment, particularly EFS, improves risk stratification, and MICS may reduce mortality in frail older adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cimaglia et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Valvular heart disease (n=568). Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) assessment added to Euroscore II vs. Euroscore II alone was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year (Harrell's C +0.054, p=<0.001). The addition of the Edmonton Frailty Scale to Euroscore II significantly improved prognostic accuracy for 1-year mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (Harrell's C +0.054, p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e64e78050d08c1b76ac5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-026-00382-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper