PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026European Journal of Emergency Medicine0 citations

Neuromuscular blocking agents for tracheal intubation of critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
PMPedro Vitale MendesIMIan Ward Abdalla MaiaRHRafael von Hellmann

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents on first-attempt success and adverse events in emergency intubations.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies.
  • Compared outcomes of sedative-hypnotic plus NMBA versus sedative-hypnotic alone.
  • Included studies involved critically ill adults in nonoperative settings.
  • Screened articles from multiple medical databases.
  • Included 13 studies with 14,072 participants.
  • NMBA use improved first-attempt success rates, ranging from 69% to 92%.
  • Pooled odds ratio for success was 2.72, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.42–5.21.
  • Adverse event outcomes had very low certainty due to inconsistent data.

Abstract

Background and importance Emergency tracheal intubation in critically ill adults is associated with a high risk of peri-intubation adverse events, making first-attempt success a key safety target. Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) improves the proportion of first-attempt success and reduces adverse events during emergent intubations outside the operating room. Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials or nonrandomized studies comparing sedative-hypnotic plus NMBA versus sedative-hypnotic alone in critically ill adults undergoing emergency endotracheal intubation in nonoperative settings. Animal, cadaveric, manikin/simulation, and pediatric studies were excluded. Articles were screened on 21 August 2025, in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection. Main results Of 4736 screened citations, 13 studies (8 cohort; 5 before-after studies) were included in the quantitative analysis, with 14 072 participants. NMBA use was associated with higher first-attempt success, which ranged from 69 to 92% (pooled odds ratio, 2.72; 95% onfidence interval: 1.42–5.21; low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes related to adverse events were rated as very low certainty due to sparse data, inconsistent reporting, and serious imprecision. Conclusion NMBA use during emergency intubation was associated with improved first-attempt success, although the certainty of evidence was low.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mendes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e66378050d08c1b76cd4https://doi.org/10.1097/mej.0000000000001338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper