Supplemental Material for Are Feigning Screens “Competent to Stand Trial”? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology

Key Points

• The study aims to assess the effectiveness of various forensic assessments in determining trial competency amidst feigning.
• Conducted a systematic review of relevant literature
• Performed a meta-analysis on assessment tools
• Evaluated the effectiveness of Miller Forensic Assessment and others
• Miller Forensic Assessment showed significant reliability in measuring competence
• Atypical Presentation Scales indicated varying effectiveness
• Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology revealed critical insights on feigning behaviors

Abstract