Adaptation is critical for biodiversity to persist under global change. Within ecological communities, species often face tradeoffs between adapting to shifting abiotic conditions and navigating the complex selective pressures imposed by interaction networks. We hypothesize that network architectures characterized by high interaction diversity and overlap constrain coevolutionary dynamics, with asymmetric outcomes for exploiters and victims. Specifically, we predict that exploiters, subject to spread and conflicting selection imposed by their victims, will evolve more slowly and show reduced capacity to track victims' evolutionary responses, with these constraints strongest for generalist exploiters. In contrast, victims will show more variable dynamics depending on the coherence of selection (i.e. whether pressures from different exploiters push the victim's trait in the same versus different directions). To test this, we simulated trait evolution in coevolving communities of exploiters and victims across 91 empirical networks, and in artificial networks designed to isolate specific structural effects. Our results show that higher connectance, species richness, nestedness and centrality homogenize biotic effects and increase fluctuations in trait matching, ultimately weakening coevolutionary coupling. Under these conditions, exploiters face conflicting selection that slows evolution, whereas victims either benefit from aligned selection that accelerates evolution or are constrained by multiple pressures. Together, our findings suggest that network architecture plays a fundamental role in shaping coevolution and adaptation, and raises broader questions about its influence on eco‐evolutionary processes in more complex and environmentally variable systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alexandre Fuster‐ Calvo
Cecilia Siliansky de Andreazzi
Christine Parent
Oikos
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Paris Cité
Sorbonne Université
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Calvo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37774fe01fead37c5782 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.12357