PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Intraoperative Magnesium Sulfate and Early Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Clinical Study Integrating Molecular Docking and Protein Interaction Network Analysis

View Full Paper
TTTamer TamdoğanEGErsin GünerITIlke Tamdogan

Key Result

Intraoperative magnesium sulfate did not significantly improve early postoperative pain scores or reduce remifentanil consumption (236 µg vs 319 µg, p=0.27) during lumbar microdiscectomy.

Key Points

  • This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intraoperative magnesium sulfate on early postoperative analgesia and recovery outcomes.
  • Retrospective cohort study with 38 patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy.
  • Divided into control (no MgSO4) and MgSO4 groups based on intraoperative magnesium administration.
  • Postoperative pain assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale at multiple time points.
  • Reviewed intraoperative remifentanil consumption, extubation time, and mobilization time.
  • Included molecular docking and protein-protein interaction analysis.
  • Postoperative NRS scores were lower in the MgSO4 group, but not statistically significant.
  • Mean remifentanil consumption was lower in the MgSO4 group (236 µg) compared to control (319 µg), but not significantly different (p = 0.27).
  • Significant effect of time on NRS scores observed, but no significant overall group effect.
  • Molecular analyses suggested stable morphine binding and highlighted glutamatergic signaling in the interaction network.

Structured PICO

Does intraoperative magnesium sulfate improve early postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy?

P
Population
38 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II undergoing elective single-level lumbar microdiscectomy under general anesthesia
I
Intervention
Intravenous MgSO4 bolus of 30 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/h until skin closure
C
Comparator
Standard anesthesia without MgSO4
O
Outcome
Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after admission to the post-anesthesia care unitpatient reported

Intraoperative magnesium sulfate administration did not significantly improve early postoperative pain scores or perioperative recovery parameters following lumbar microdiscectomy.

Limitations

  • Retrospective design
  • In silico nature of molecular findings

Abstract

Background: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) has been investigated as an adjuvant in perioperative analgesia because of its antagonistic effects on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA receptor) and its potential to attenuate central sensitization. However, clinical findings regarding its analgesic efficacy remain inconsistent across surgical procedures. Lumbar microdiscectomy is a common spinal procedure in which effective early postoperative pain control is important for patient comfort and early mobilization. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intraoperative MgSO4 administration on early postoperative analgesia and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included thirty-eight patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II who underwent elective single-level lumbar microdiscectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups according to intraoperative magnesium administration: a control group receiving standard anesthesia without MgSO4 (n = 19) and an MgSO4 group receiving an intravenous MgSO4 bolus of 30 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/h until skin closure (n = 19). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative remifentanil consumption, extubation time, and time to first mobilization. Complementary in silico analyses included molecular docking and protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis. Results: Postoperative NRS scores were numerically lower in the MgSO4 group; however, between-group differences were not statistically significant. Mean intraoperative remifentanil consumption was numerically lower in the MgSO4 group (236 ± 166 µg) compared with the control group (319 ± 298 µg), without statistical significance (p = 0.27). Repeated-measures analysis demonstrated the significant effect of time on postoperative NRS scores, whereas the overall group effect was not significant. Molecular analyses indicated stable morphine binding to opioid receptors and highlighted glutamatergic signaling components as central nodes within the interaction network. Conclusions: Intraoperative MgSO4 administration was not associated with significant improvements in early postoperative pain scores or perioperative recovery parameters following lumbar microdiscectomy. Molecular analyses provide exploratory in silico insights and should be interpreted cautiously given the retrospective design and the in silico nature of these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tamdoğan et al. (2026) studied this question. Intraoperative magnesium sulfate did not significantly improve early postoperative pain scores or reduce remifentanil consumption (236 µg vs 319 µg, p=0.27) during lumbar microdiscectomy.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37774fe01fead37c5868https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15082888
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper