PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 13, 20260 citationsOpen Access

If the Model can tell, the Compression is not Transparent: measuring Logit-Fidelity in LLM context compression

View Full Paper
RRRégis RIGAUD

Key Points

  • To assess token-level behavioral fidelity in LLMs under various contextual compression strategies using a new benchmark.
  • Developed LFCM benchmark to measure flip rates at τ = 0 during token generation.
  • Evaluated three KV-cache compression strategies: uniform eviction, H2O-approx, and recency-based.
  • Used a deterministic evaluation protocol with quantized attention methods across multiple models and datasets.
  • All compression methods resulted in significant flip rates, ranging from 5% to 50%.
  • Method rankings changed for long conversations, with recency-based methods exhibiting up to 3× higher flip rates.
  • The qualitative ranking of compression strategies was consistent across different model families and configurations.

Abstract

We introduce LFCM (Logit-Faithful Context Memory), a benchmark designed to measure token-level behavioral fidelity under LLM context compression. LFCM quantifies the flip rate at temperature zero (τ = 0) - the fraction of generation steps where the greedy argmax token changes when the KV-cache is compressed. Using a teacher-forced, fully deterministic protocol (4-bit NF4 quantization, SDPA attention), we evaluate three KV-cache compression strategies - uniform eviction, H2O-approx, and recency-based (StreamingLLM-style) - across multiple models (Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B, Qwen-14B) and datasets, including both synthetic conversations and long naturalistic contexts (ShareGPT). Our results reveal three key findings: Non-trivial divergence: All methods produce significant flip rates (5–50%), even at high retention levels. Context-dependent inversion: On long real-world conversations, method rankings invert - recency-based eviction produces up to 3× higher flip rates due to the loss of early, structurally important context. Cross-model robustness: The qualitative ranking of methods is preserved across model families and scales (7B → 14B). This benchmark exposes a critical blind spot in current evaluation practices: standard metrics (accuracy, perplexity, semantic similarity) do not capture whether compressed models preserve exact token-level behavior. LFCM provides a complementary, deterministic measure of strict behavioral transparency, essential for reproducible pipelines, persistent-memory agents, and safety-critical applications. Version 2 updates: Fixes a first-token evaluation bug, adds cross-scale validation (14B), and introduces the context-structure dependence finding.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Régis RIGAUD (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc89823afacbeac03eb2a9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19510356
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1If the Model can tell, the Compression is not Transparent: measuring Logit-Fidelity in LLM context compression2026
  2. 2lost in compaction2026
  3. 3KV Cache Compression, But What Must We Give in Return? A Comprehensive Benchmark of Long Context Capable Approaches2024
  4. 4Accuracy is Not All You Need2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Can Compressed LLMs Truly Act? An Empirical Evaluation of Agentic Capabilities in LLM Compression2025