PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 23, 2017SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología411 citationsOpen Access

The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health

KCKei Long CheungPKPeter M. ten KloosterCSCees Smit

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This is one of first studies to provide strong evidence that voluntary recruitment may lead to a strong non-response bias in health-related prevalence estimates in adolescents, as compared to mandatory recruitment. The resulting underestimation in prevalence of health behaviours and well-being measures appeared large, up to a four-fold lower proportion for self-reported alcohol consumption. Correlations between variables, though, appeared to be insensitive to sampling bias.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cheung et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd58cafb7610310c1022cfhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper