PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2026Modern Rheumatology0 citations

Upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in methotrexate-naïve Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term efficacy and safety through 5 years in the SELECT-EARLY study

View Full Paper
TTTsutomu TakeuchiRVRonald VollenhovenYUYukitaka Ueki

Key Points

  • To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib compared to methotrexate in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • Randomisation of patients to upadacitinib or methotrexate
  • Efficacy assessed through Week 260
  • Adverse events monitored over 5 years
  • Non-responder imputation used for analysis
  • 89% of patients completed Week 48
  • Patients on upadacitinib showed better overall long-term efficacy
  • Greater inhibition of structural joint progression with upadacitinib
  • 30 mg upadacitinib had higher adverse event rates compared to other groups
  • No new safety signals identified overall

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the long-term (5-year) efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy compared with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis included in the Phase 3 SELECT-EARLY study. Methods Japanese patients were randomised 2:1:1:1 to upadacitinib 7.5, 15, or 30 mg daily or MTX 7.5 mg/week (titrated to ≤ 15 mg/week). Efficacy assessments through Week 260 are reported as observed for patients receiving continuous upadacitinib or MTX, and by randomised group using non-responder imputation. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected over 5 years and reported as events per 100 patient-years. Results Of the 138 Japanese patients treated, 123 (89%) completed Week 48 and 121 (88%) entered the long-term extension on study drug. Patients receiving upadacitinib had better overall long-term efficacy outcomes compared with patients receiving MTX. Similarly, treatment with upadacitinib resulted in numerically greater inhibition of structural joint progression through 5 years, relative to MTX. Higher TEAE rates were observed in the 30 mg upadacitinib group compared with all other treatment groups, and no new safety signals were identified overall. Conclusion This sub-analysis of the SELECT-EARLY Japanese population corroborates findings from the global study population on the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of upadacitinib.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takeuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddd9b1e195c95cdefd6fe7https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roag031
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper