Abstract This paper investigates the chronological and geographical evolution of the practice of recarving sculpture in the first three centuries CE, assessing the impact it had on ancient viewers, as well as the agency of sculptors and patrons. After considering the reasons for the higher or lower frequency of reworking during specific periods, the paper presents an overview of the geographical distribution of recarved portraits of Roman emperors throughout the Empire, showing that the practice was not connected with the location of main sculptural centers, but rather followed its own logic, connected with local preferences and resources. Lastly, the paper considers how thoroughly imperial portraits were reworked, to investigate the agency and technical choices made by ancient makers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Francesca Bologna
Raffaella Bucolo
Journal of Roman Archaeology
University of Edinburgh
University of Verona
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bologna et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ddda0de195c95cdefd7895 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s104775942610066x