Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This is a “primer” on how to play the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game effectively. Existing research approaches offer the participant limited help in understanding how to cope effectively with such interactions. To gain a deeper understanding of how to be effective in such a partially competitive and partially cooperative environment, a computer tournament was conducted for the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Decision rules were submitted by entrants who were recruited primarily from experts in game theory from a variety of disciplines: psychology, political science, economics, sociology, and mathematics. The results of the tournament demonstrate that there are subtle reasons for an individualistic pragmatist to cooperate as long as the other side does, to be somewhat for-giving, and to be optimistic about the other side's responsiveness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert Axelrod
Journal of Conflict Resolution
University of Michigan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert Axelrod (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69de4fd91d9bba5129b0bec1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400101
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: